A class-action lawsuit filed against SBC Communications Inc. (www.sbc.com) alleges the BOC purposely slowed Internet access speeds to preserve bandwidth, while it pulled in thousands of DSL customers through its Project Pronto.
The ILEC denies the charges.
In New York, Verizon Communications (www.verizon.com) received a thumbs up this fall from state regulators who say the incumbent is operating at commercial volumes and processing competitor orders in a more timely fashion. It took the better part of the year for Verizon to get there, however. It was last December that Verizon received FCC (www.fcc.gov) approval to offer in-region long-distance service in the state.
In the BellSouth Corp. (www.bellsouth. com) territory, the battle is to determine whether the incumbent is ready to offer in-region, long-distance service in some of its states. The Bell company swears it is.
But are the BOCs’ promises of fast DSL and bundled services too much too early?
“The pressure is mounting” on the BOCs to perform up to their promises, says Lawrence J. Spiwak, president and chairman of the Phoenix Center for Advanced Legal and Economic Public Policy Studies (www. phoenix-center.org) a Washington-based think tank.
“Is this strategic anticompetitive conduct [by the incumbents] against their rivals? Yes,” Spiwak says. “But on the other hand, they’re trying to get their networks upgraded, and that takes time. They need time to roll out their new services.”
In Houston, some SBC DSL users aren’t willing to give extra time. They want what they say SBC promised, and they want it now.
Joining in a class-action lawsuit filed in a Texas district court are several dozen Houston DSL users. They seek unspecified damages and claim Southwestern Bell (www.swbell. com) and affiliated SBC companies are slowing down their Internet access speeds.
At issue is the high-speed DSLs that allow web users to connect to the Internet quicker than using standard modem lines. According to the lawsuit, SBC guarantees a minimum connection rate of 384kbps.
“However, according to the plaintiffs, SBC has intentionally lowered the access rate to e-mail and newsgroups by two-thirds of the promised rate–128kbps–without notifying customers or giving any discount for the inferior service,” says Geoffrey Berg, an associate attorney with Berg & Androphy (www. bafirm.com) the firm handling the case for the DSL users.
Berg says that if the case goes to trial, his firm will show that SBC is capping access speeds “in order to preserve bandwidth space and avoid upgrading their systems.”
In Internet message board postings, Southwestern Bell technical support people have admitted there’s a cap on speeds, the lawsuit says.
By withholding bandwidth, the DSL users claim that SBC is able to resell it. In fact, the Internet users don’t believe that SBC owns enough bandwidth to deliver on its promises, according to the lawsuit.
The promises in question emerged when SBC began to operate its $6 billion Project Pronto, a large-scale effort to roll out DSL as fast as possible to as many customers as possible.
The massive DSL project, which suffered some installation problems this summer, is on track to sign up 1 million customers by year’s end, SBC says.
The DSL service is slated to be available to a total of approximately 77 million SBC customers by 2002.
SBC contends that its DSL service delivers at the guaranteed speeds when a customer’s computer and the SBC CO are geographically close together. That means to receive SBC DSL service today, the phone line running from a customer’s home or business to a DSL-equipped CO must be no longer than 12,000 feet, or 2.2 miles, and must meet certain transmission criteria, according to SBC spokesman Selim Bingol.
Houston DSL Users’ Lawsuit Allegations Against SBC
Source: Berg & Androphy (www.bafirm.com)
Beyond that point, many factors can impact the rate at which data are transferred online, including Internet congestion, server or router speeds, protocol overheads, etc., he says.
“Many of the Bell companies appear to be offering a consumer-grade Internet service that is oversubscribed,” says Jonathan Atkin, senior analyst of broadband services with Dain Rauscher Wessels (www. dainrauscherwessels.com) an investment banking and brokerage services firm.
“Thus, what may nominally be, say, 384kbps or 512kbps bandwidth to the end user, effectively becomes far less throughput when one considers congestion in the metro-area backhaul legs,” Atkin says.
Also, speeds at which people access different websites, including public news servers, may vary based on the performance characteristics the service provider or website operator establishes, Bingol says.
Speeds for accessing newsgroup data are maximized at 128kbps in order to provide a more reliable service for customers using newsgroups, SBC says. Access to e-mail and to other Internet applications aren’t affected.
SBC also says that only about 1 percent of its DSL subscribers use the newsgroups.
DSL connection speeds and the speeds that data are accessed from newsgroups are two different issues and shouldn’t be confused, Bingol notes. Maximizing newsgroup speeds doesn’t free up bandwidth that would allow SBC to sign up other DSL customers, but it does help balance the load on the Internet news servers SBC operates.
Verizon has experienced some of the same growing pains with its DSL service. Where Verizon has failed with its DSL offerings “is in promising delivery dates,” says Bob Ingalls, president of Verizon’s General Business Group. “DSL is a lot more complicated to install than dial tone.”
For that reason, Verizon has been caught at times in a backlog of DSL orders, in which it must adjust a delivery date in order to catch up on orders, Ingalls says.
“The demand is huge,” he adds.
Verizon and other incumbents are trying to stay on top of the demand. They have implemented quality measures to ensure that what gets promised gets delivered.
“But I’m sure that no one in our company would stand up and say we have it solved,” Ingalls notes. “We don’t. We’re just trying to manage the load.”
DSL availability is the No. 1 issue, with provisioning and maintenance a close second, he says.
In order to meet self-imposed quality requirements, Verizon sets its own installation and provision dates for DSL, which largely remains an unregulated service.
“In the future, though, regulators will get involved if we over-promise and under- deliver,” Ingalls says, adding that the FCC and state regulators now monitor the statistics that Verizon files on meeting their QoS requirements.
“This is not a free ride where we do whatever we want,” he says.
Customers Are Antsy
Problems do crop up in BOC provisioning of new services, and the reasons are legitimate. But that doesn’t mean customers don’t get angry, which could prompt regulators to get involved.
Southwestern Bell DSL Marketing Material
|How fast is it? Connection speeds for DSL typically range from 384kbps to 1.544mbps downstream and 128kbps upstream. In addition, a DSL line allows for one line to carry both voice and data signals, and for the data part of the line to be continuously connected, so you can talk on your phone line at the same time you’re surfing the Internet.|
Experience the DSL Speed!
|Note: Service and speed options not available in some areas. Minimum connection speed or “sync-rate” (384kbps or 1.5mbps) is guaranteed between customer location and serving CO. Connection speeds may be higher under optimal conditions. Actual data transfer or throughput may be lower than sync-rate due to Internet congestion, server or router speeds, protocol overheads, and other factors that cannot be controlled by SBC companies.|
Source: Southwestern Bell (www.swbell.com)
For instance, in New York, it’s possible that Verizon underestimated the volume of competition that its OSS would need to handle, says Dena Alo-Colbeck, director of public policy for regulatory consultancy Miller Isar (www.millerisar.com). That may have led to the contentions that the Verizon OSS testing in New York did not properly test full commercial volumes.
“This is an error that regulators and competitors alike have striven to correct in subsequent [Section] 271 proceedings,” Alo-Colbeck says.
Regarding the SBC lawsuit in Texas, Alo-Colbeck believes “that SBC, realizing that high-speed Internet services are the profit centers of the future, may simply be attempting to lock in as much of the Internet market as possible as soon as possible.”
End users are demanding more high-speed data lines than carriers currently are configured to deliver, explains Judy Reed Smith, CEO of ATLANTIC-ACM Inc. (www.atlantic-acm.com) a consulting and research firm specializing in telecom. And in trying to satisfy more customers than their network allows, she thinks SBC has its “over-full hand caught in the cookie jar.”
“Traditionally, incumbent carriers would dial down to save their networks,” Reed Smith says. “It’s possible that SBC has dialed down to protect their routers. They appear to be choking on their over-delivery.”
In an ATLANTIC-ACM study released this summer, the firm reported that DSL service remains far from the QoS that customers expect. And the average scores for all wholesale DSL providers fall below average in the areas of responsiveness of customer service, according to the report.
“In this do-or-die market, what will really distinguish the top-notch DSL providers from the rest of the pack is the extent to which they are able to remain focused on the customer’s needs,” Reed Smith says.
Therein could be part of the solution for the BOCs’ delivery problems. But their setbacks could mount before they’re adequately fixed.
“This is a cultural issue. We don’t have an incumbent with a culture of customer service,” says Spiwak.
Meanwhile, Berg says that the class-action lawsuit continues to attract more plaintiffs. As of late September, 30 people had joined the suit.